pg. 135
Upon canvassing the returns of the April election, it
was ascertained that neither place had received a
majority of all the votes cast. Garnavillo received
254; Guttenberg, 177; and Elkader, 115.
A new election was therefore ordered by the
commissioners, between Garnavillo and Guttenberg,
which resulted as follows: - Garnavillo received 279,
and Guttenberg 245 votes, giving a majority in favor
of Garnavillo of 23 votes. Whereupon the
commissioners declared that in pursuance of said act,
Garnavillo be and remain the permanent seat of
justice of said Clayton county.
At this election, of those who voted at the April
election in favor of Elkader, sixty-eight voted for
Guttenberg, twenty-five for Garnavillo, and twenty
did not vote.
There have been three attempts to establish societies
in this county upon joint stock association plans,
vix: - the Clydesdale Joint Stock, Agricultural
and Commercial Company, the Community
Colony, [transcriber note: "Communia
Colony"] and the Liberty Colony.
The CLYESDALE COMPANY was organized in Scotland on
the 4th day of April, 1849, for the purpose of
acquiring land in some suitable locality in the
United States of America, in which to establish by
means of the united capital and industry of its
partners, a comfortable home for themselves and
families, where they may follow a more simple, useful
and rational mode of life than is found practicable
in the complex and competition state of society, from
which they have become anxious to retire. The
members were John Jack, James Love, John Craig, John
McAndrews, James Shanks, James Gardner, Robertson
Sinclair, John Davis and John Campbell.*
___________________________________________________________________________
*The leading provisions of their articles of
association were as follows: The capital stock was
fixed at $20,000, divided into eight hundred shares
of $25 each. The affairs of the company to be under
the control of a board of directors, consisting of a
president, treasurer and secretary, who were to
appoint a manager to conduct the general business.
Each resident member owning four shares, was entitled
to the occupancy of a house and two acres of land for
the use of himself and family, and an annual
allowance for their subsistence. Five per cent, one
the capital stock and one-fourth of the profits went
into the funds of the company, and the balance of the
profits to the members individually in proportion to
the time each had labored for the company.
They purchased unimproved lands in Monona township,
on section 21, about three miles southwest from the
village of Monona, and settled upon it in the winter
of 1850 51. Improvements were rapidly made for
a short time, when dissatisfaction and petty
jealousies began to spring up among the members, and
continued to increase until the 20th of March. 1852,
when at a meeting of the company it was unanimously
agreed to dissolve. Reuben Noble and Samuel Murdock,
Esqs., were appointed their attorneys, with power to
sell their property, and close up their affairs. The
following fall the lands were sold, the proceeds of
the sale scarcely amounting to the cost of the
improvements.
___________________________________________________________________________
pg. 135 continues
The COMMUNITY COLONY [transcriber note: Communia
Colony] was organized in July, 1850, in this county
by Joseph Venus, Johan Enderes, Fred. Weis, H. Pape,
T. Nagel, K. Kopp. Jacob Pensar, Lewis Weinel. Johhan
Taffz, Michael Bramme, Joseph Gremfer and W.
Krisinger, for the purpose of carrying on
agricultural, mechanical arts and trades, and
such other industrial pursuits as they might deem
expedient and desirable. The capital of the
association was made up by joining the individual
property of its members, and consisted of four
hundred acres of land in sections 7, 8 and 18,
township 92, range 4, and eighty acres in sections 13
and 14, township 92, range 5, valued at $1,800;
stock, teams, farming utensils, tools and furniture,
$1,200.*
___________________________________________________________________________
*Their constitution provided that no division of the
property should be made except by the unanimous
consent of its members. Each member was entitled to
support, and in case of his death, the society should
take care of the widow and educate the children. If
the widow and children should desire to withdraw from
the society, they could do so in the same manner as
the husband, and take his share of the property. If
the member dying should leave no widow or children,
his share should vest in the society. New members
might be admitted after a residence of three months
with the association, by a two-third vote. But in
case of rejection, candidates should make no claim
for services. Members might withdraw and receive the
value of the property put in by them and the balance
in one and two years. For infractions of the rules
and regulations of the society, and for immoral
conduct, members might be expelled, in which case
they were entitled to receive their shares the same
as those withdrawing. The business was placed under
the management and control of a president, secretary
and treasurer; but for all sales and purchases
amounting to over $25, the concurrence of a majority
of the society was necessary.
This organization seemed to operate very well for a
time. Improvements were begun and additions were made
to their number, until a strong partisan spirit
prevailed at their annual elections for officers, and
ran so high that the minority party refused to submit
to the majority. To avoid a dissolution, in July,
1858, material alterations were made in their
articles of association, and the name was changed to
Communia Workingmens League. The
property was all transferred to the new society, and
amounted to fourteen hundred and forty acres of land,
valued at $6,725, and stock, tools, merchandise and
building material at $5,296, making a sum total of
$12,021. Showing an increase of $9,021 in the three
years of its operation.
___________________________________________________________________________