IOWA HISTORY PROJECT |
Chapter XVII Burlington
Saturday Evening Post Capt
E. H. Thomas RIVER
HELPED DEFRAUD REVENUE DISTILLERIES
THAT ESCAPED THE
GALLON TAX Old
Tax-Dodgers Now Gone to Their Reward.
Straightening The Des Moines During
my time on the steamboats there
were many distilleries in operation at the different towns between
Davenport and St. Louis. The
government tax on high wines at that time was two dollars per gallon.
This heavy tax made it an inducement to defraud the government.
Several of the distilleries told me that they could not pay this tax and
get any money out of it themselves.
That to operate a distillery and be honest would prove a losing
game for the operator. So
they devised a number of plans to escape the payment of the two dollars
per gallon. After the high
wines were made they were piped into barrels in the bonded warehouses,
where the law required them to stay until the tax was paid, the barrels
stamped and the stamps cancelled. Now
there may have been some honest men among those government officials
around the distilleries, but many of them contracted the habit of
holding their hands behind their backs to receive some money from the
distiller. After receiving
the cash the key to the bonded warehouse was turned over to the
distiller and the government official would have business out of town.
A steamboat would land and the barrels would be rolled out of the
warehouse and on to her decks. Thro
this plan the distiller would evade the payment of $160 on every barrel
shipped, and the government lose just that amount.
All of the steamboats carried this stuff when asked to do so.
I remember that the government officials at one time commenced an
action against one of the Northern Line boats, with the idea of
collecting the tax from the boat, or company.
It was a test case, in which the government lost.
The court decided, that as common carriers, the steamboat men
were not liable. That they
were not supposed or required to know anything about the taxes, whether
they were paid or not. Another
plan to dodge the tax was to underestimate the capacity of output of the
distillery. If the house had
a capacity of 2,00 gallons in 24 hours, the proprietor would estimate it
at 1,000. Then, when things
were just right, when he had the storekeeper
and gauger fixed, and there were no revenue officers around, he
would “double the mash” as
they called it. Produce
2,000 gallons in 24 hours, instead of the usual 1,000 gallons shown in
their daily reports. This
extra output of 1,000 gallons was got out of the building at once
usually in the night time. Many
of these establishments, owned flat boats, with which they could do the
night work. Take the stuff
to some rectifier who would soon convert it into whiskey.
The most ingenious and successful method for getting rid of this
tax I noticed was invented by a man who operated a distillery and
vinegar factory in the same building.
He would make a shipment of both kinds of gods, but many of the
barrels branded vinegar contained high wines.
This man was a Yankee from the New England states, and a shrewd
fellow. He operated this
establishment for many years, and the revenue officers never got on to
the trick.
Now and then the steamboat clerks would take a cargo of this
kind, knowing that it was a crooked deal.
On one occasion we were approaching a certain town there, and
received a hail from the distillery, which was located near the lower
end of a chute, two miles below the town.
We went in there and found a gang of men rolling barrels out of
the bonded warehouse into a large flat boat.
This work was being done about the middle of the afternoon.
We simply put out lines on to the flat boat and towed it along up
the river, the gang of men transferring the barrels to the steamboat as
we went. When this had been
done the flat boat was cut loose from the steamer.
The man in charge of the barrels was in a nervous condition,
asked many questions, and was very anxious that the boat, should reach
Davenport that night.. I suspected that he was making a steal, and
during the following year I learned he was.
There were one thousand barrels of the stuff, on which he cleaned
up $160 per barrel, the amount of the government tax.
As a result of this shipment, I was called to Chicago as a
witness in the federal court, where the U. S. attorney gave me the
details of the transaction. A
subpoena was also issued for the clerk of the steamer, but he could not
be found. The government
officials appeared to have received their price at both ends of the
route, as we landed the barrels in Davenport in daylight the following
day. The government had no
positive testimony and the case never came to trial.
In after years, I met the clerk and he told me that he made no
bill for the goods, but that the boat received one dollar per barrel, or
one thousand dollars, for the shipment.
The usual freight charge would have been about 25 cents per
barrel.
A special revenue officer was at one time sent to one of these
distilleries to watch the proprietor the government officers and the
barrels. The distillery was
located about three miles below the town, and the special man was
stopping at a hotel in town. While
he slept, a steamboat landed at the bonded warehouse, and loaded all of
the high wines. I met the
steamer about five miles below the distillery, a big stern wheel boat
and she was sailing rapidly, down the river.
The only lights that I could see about her were those on her
chimneys, and she stood away from me so far that I did not get her name.
When I landed at the town, I met the special revenue officer, and
he appeared to be very much disgruntled because I could not give him the
name of the steamboat which had stolen his whiskey.
He made much noise at the landing, but none of the people on the
levee were so mean as to insinuate that the special had been well paid
for his sleep at the hotel. He
took the train south that day but he did not find the boat nor the
barrels. I
was well acquainted with one of these distillers, who operated two
plants, which produced 2,000 gallons of the liquid every 24 hours.
He run them regularly for 10 or 12 years, beat the government
every week in the year, and it was his boast that he had never spent an
hour in jail or paid a fine. After
he had quit the business I was joking with him, and told him I would
like to have one half of the money he had paid the government as taxes.
He answered this by saying that I would be much better fixed
financially if I had one half of that he did not pay.
“But,” he said, “It cost me a lot of money to dodge this
tax. I was forced to
purchase everybody in the two distilleries, from firemen up to the
ranking government officer. Some of the those government officials
demanded a high price, but I had to get them in order to run the
business.”
The United States district attorney, in Chicago, questioned me in
reference to this man. He
said that the government had been able to catch all of the other
fellows, now and then, but had never succeeded in making a case against
this one man who was operating two distilleries.
And so the business went along until the early 80’s, when many
of the distillers had gone out of business, or been forced out by the
government. Straightening
the Des Moines
Increasing the value of the low lands of Iowa by straightening
the Des Moines river and building banks and levees is advocated by
Captain E. H. Thomas in a letter to the courier.
Mr. Thomas who had made a deep study of the stream, its
possibilities and its defects, points a way to reclaim many acres in
Iowa, and states that the state should get busy at once and do
something. Captain Thomas letter follows:
“I Have read your editorial in reference to straightening or
taking the kinks out of the streams of Iowa, and as you suggest I think
our state officials should show some interest in the matter of
reclaiming the low lands. For
a period of about twenty years, I made a study of the streams and the
action of the water. My
business made it necessary for me to acquire a knowledge of these
things. I learned this.
That the natural course of all streams is from point to bend;
that the main channel is in this direction and at no place under the
points. All short bends hold
the water or carry a head. Such
head of water varies from a few inches to several feet, owing to the
shape of the head. From
levels and measurements taken at Ottumwa when the river was at flood
stage, I am convinced that the bends between Ottumwa when the river was
at flood stage, I am convinced that the bends between the Ottumwa boat
house and the south of village creek carries a head of no less than two
feet.
“The velocity of the discharge is checked and the points acting
as so many wing dams, back the water up in the bends.
I am also satisfied that if the river was straightened between
the two points named, there would be two feet less water at Ottumwa,
when the river is at its usual high water stage at fourteen feet. “The only place to get a correct water mark is on a stretch of straight river. One does not notice it in passing down with a boat, but the river between the packing house and the mouth of village creek is as crooked as a snake in motion. From the top of Monkey mountain one can get a good view of it. It is all short bends to the right and o the left, what we river men call “letter S bends.” Here in these bends the current is checked and in these ends the current is checked and the water held piled up. If there is a fourteen foot rise above Ottumwa it I safe to say that it will gather a head of two feet in passing the South Ottumwa bend and hold the sixteen feet until it passes the mouth of Village Creek. This is an easy problem for all those who have investigated the matter, but not so plain to those who have not. Between the mouth of Village creek and Eldon, where there are no short bends, the river will again lake its proper level of fourteen feet. Of course if the banks along there should be but twelve feet there would be two feet of water on the bottom farms, as water when it has a chance seeks its level and find it, so that it appears to be very plain that what is needed to reclaim or keep the water off the 50,000 acres of low lands along the Des Moines river is to first straighten the stream, lake all of the short bends out of it then to put all ------------------- [rest of article missing] |
Return to Table of Contents - Life on the Mississippi
Return to Iowa History Project