ANNALS OF IOWA
Volume 6, July 1904, No. 6
FRONTIER MILLS
BY GEORGE C. DUFFIELD
While James Duffield was leading his family into
what is now Van Buren County, Iowa, in April, 1837, there were thousands of
settlers on the move toward the same country. Coming from Pennsylvania and Ohio,
they were leaving actual or prospective improvements of vast importance. Canals,
mills, factories and steamboats were everywhere. They were joined on the way
down the Ohio by movers from the Carolinas, Kentucky and other states, and all
were afloat in keel boats, "broads" and steamboats. "Times,"
the nation over, were "hard," which was the reason for a great part of
the crowding to the west. The people literally poured across the Mississippi and
up the Des Moines, in '37, '38, '39 and '40, and all with the full sense of the
contrast between improved localities such as they had left, and the unimproved
like that to which they were going. The people as a class were of excellent
stock, though of indifferent or reversed circumstances. It is clear, then, that
among the scrambling claim hunters, there were the most progressive, hopeful and
provident of men. They anticipated the vast commercial importance of the running
streams; and, as legislators, not only gave mill grants along the Des Moines and
Skunk Rivers, but along Big Cedar Creek. In those grants they required the
construction and free maintenance of locks and gates for the passage of
"steam, keel, and flat boats and other water craft" in the first two
streams named, and fixed the dimensions of the Skunk River locks at 75 feet in
length by 15 in width. (Statute Laws of the Territory of Iowa, 1838-1839). While
others thronged along the Des Moines timber and up the minor streams staking out
"eighties" and "quarters," these men were threading the
channels locating mill sites. Indeed, mechanics, especially mill-wrights, were
in numbers out of proportion with other tradesmen. Aside from farmers who had
served apprenticeships at trades, I think there were more millers and mill
wrights than all other tradesmen combined. And so it is easily understood how
the Des Moines Valley and its minor streams came to be so quickly and thickly
settled. And, bearing in mind that the river, as it flowed out of Van Buren
county, washed a slave shore on the right, and the Half Breed Tract, with
its uncertain land titles on the left, it is clear how there came to be in
territorial days, along the river in this county, such a wealth of manufacturing
cities; along the minor streams nearly thirty water mills. By naming the cities,
their history can be traced in our county records. But these old creek mills,
vastly more important to the home builder, arose, ran for the first few years,
and vanished, leaving scarcely a trace of their sites, and seldom a line of
record as to their location or significance. None now run, and only one is
standing. I would like to set out the settlers' needs of these old mills, and by
showing the efforts of the old millers to meet those wants, make tardy endeavor
to fix their place in the story of the early days. Of the "cities" to
which I refer as having had an actual existence, there were, Farmington,
Plymouth, Harrisburg, Watertown, New Lexington, Rochester, Meek's Mills,
Rushville, Columbus, Alexander, Portland, Mechanicsburg, New market,
Philadelphia, Pittsburg, Hartford, Bentonsport, Winchester, Parkersburg, and the
less ambitiously named, but quite as ambitiously planned, Rising Sun, Van Buren,
Hedvolante, Salubria, Black Hawk, Napoleon, Iowaville and others. I can add
nothing to prove more surely from whence the settlers actually came, nor whither
they were, in imagination, going.
Now our family, and that of each other settler in the
first few years, possessed very little more than the clothing they wore to the
new home. True, a little meal, flour, salt, and a few dishes and tools, were
brought. But the country over, finding these, you had the whole supply. We
happened to have stopped in Illinois two years. The little grain and a few other
necessities we could save, had been left there when we came away. In the summer
father made a trip or two back to get these things. Otherwise, for the first
season, before a crop was made, we would have been in actual want. There were
settlers who came from farther east, with whom we had to share. Not a cabin had
what could be called plenty, and many were scant of supplies. Food was not the
only question bothering us. Imagine yourself setting up housekeeping with a
family and neighbors without the item of ordinary boards. Not a single board of
any character was to be obtained for any purpose. Not a shelf, stool, door nor
anything else to be made from lumber, unless, indeed, you first made your
lumber. Obtaining this, or substitutes for it, and putting in a crop that first
season, took genius in each and every settler equal to that required to make a
statesman or a general. As I was then a boy, only, I am not speaking
self-praise. It may be interesting to know just how they did manage.
We were here, and here we stayed. Therefore, though at
first there were no mills and no commerce, yet we had food and shelter. Indeed,
had bread and boards, homemade from the ground, so to speak, to their conversion
into life and habitations. Father brought with him an axe, a plow, an auger, a
plane, known as a "jinter," and a broad-axe. Nearly every settler had
the same. A mill-wright, in addition, brought a crank-iron and a saw blade and
almost no other tools. With the axe, the cabin was raised; with it and the
broad-axe, it was floored; with it and the plow, from the prettiest of red oak
timber, the roof and door stuff were made; with it and the auger, the doors were
hinged and hung, the bedsteads and other furniture manufactured. But so great
was the need of plank, that two inch boards of more than five or six feet length
were hewn from the tree trunks, and such skill and nicety was often developed,
that, after the axe was laid aside, a plane had little to do if the board needed
to be smooth. This was very slow and tedious work. A quicker method was
"whipsawing" it. A platform would be reared on the side of a hill, a
pit dug beneath, and a log rolled on it. A man in the pit and one on the log,
with a saw like the common crosscut saw, would rip the log up into half a dozen
nice planks in a few days. But this was also slow and hard work. Those old
millers saw a better way. They all agreed as to the value of the running
streams, but applied this power in various ways.
Samuel Clayton built his cabin at the mouth of Chequest
Creek in 1836, raised a little patch of corn, and was joined by his family in
1837. That year, with his sons Henry and Harvey, he built a dam about a mile
above, on Chequest. He was the first settler, and his was the first mill west of
the Des Moines, in the present limits of the State of Iowa. The Clayton boys
were our playmates, and such idle time as we could get was spent around that
mill during its construction and use. The mills on all the little streams were
almost alike, the difference being in the dam, the wheel and in the fact that
some were only saw mills, some grist mills and some saw and grist mills
combined. In describing the Clayton mill, I will have described all the rest,
except where I note differences. The Claytons felled trees on both sides of the
creek, cut them into the longest logs possible, hewed them on two sides, and
laid them end to end, spliced and pinned, clear across the creek on bed rock.
Three or four such lines laid down; two or three feet apart, notched every four
or six feet and cross ties laid in and pinned, made the foundation frame. The
pens thus formed were filled with clay from the hillside and stone from the
creek-bed. This was the start, and with two more lines of timbers, notched and
laid down on the ends of the cross ties, and over the outside timbers of the
foundation, then other cross ties, and more long timbers, formed a row of cribs,
and gave the dam its name of "crib dam." It was raised some two feet
higher at the down-stream side than the up-stream. The cribs filled with stone
and clay, and roofed with plank, or logs finished the main part. To prevent the
back wash from undermining it, there was a row of secondary cribs built along
below and pinned to the main dam. This, filled and roofed like the main dam, the
roof slanting from a couple of feet under its comb to a few inches of the bed of
the creek, was called the apron. The whole structure was 14 or 16 feet through,
8 or 10 feet high and some 60 or 65 feet long.
Brush dams were made by commencing with the same
foundation, then upon this laying the tops of trees, the butts up-stream. These
were weighted down solid with clay and stone, then another layer of brush, the
butts a little further up-stream so as to raise the limbs a little steeper, and
this weighted as before. Then another layer of brush, and so on until the proper
height was reached. This was a quickly made, cheap, and sufficient dam. Though
not so enduring as the crib dam, it was used a great deal more often, in the
little streams. Both brush and crib dams were finished like the Clayton dam. A
trench, somewhat wider than the thickness of the dam was dug into the south bank
of the stream. The foundation was built into it some 12 or 14 feet, and the
cribs continued up some five feet, while the rest of the dam was raised to full
height. The apron stopped at the place where the low place began. This low place
was now floored with plank, the end of the dam finished up with the same
planking, and a plank wall raised against the bank opposite the end of the dam.
This plank floor and walls formed the race. Wickets at the upper and lower ends
let the water through upon the wheel.
The old water wheels all ran with a horizontal shaft.
No turbines were in use for several years. A "screw auger" wheel was
in use in some of the river mills, but on the minor streams only the undershot,
overshot and flutter or breast wheels were used. The undershot was a large
wheel, 16 or 18 feet in diameter. It received the force of the water on its
under edge, turned very slowly, and could only be used with gearings, a rare and
expensive equipment. The over shot was a big wheel, about the size of the
undershot, which received the water at the front and top and revolved very
slowly away from the current of the stream, It was only found where a dam was
built a long ways above the mill, and the water led out from the race into a
flume along the bank, gradually gaining fall, and being discharged over the
wheel back into the creek. The flutter or breast wheel was the standard wheel in
this country. It was simple, used small head of water, and needed no gearing. It
was constructed upon a shaft that was about a foot in diameter, long enough to
carry the wheel and give a bearing on each end. Holes were mortised through, say
a foot from the bearings, not intersecting, and about three by six inches.
Through the holes were driven tough scantling, which, being sawed off two or
three feet from the shaft, formed the two ends of the wheel. It was completed by
pinning to each pair of spokes a plank three by twelve or fourteen inches, and
of the length of the wheel as designed (Clayton's flutter wheel was six feet ).
Boards were then pinned with their flat sides toward the shaft, in the angles of
the spokes, and some 18 or 20 inches from the shaft. This gave something the
appearance of a headless drum with vanes or flanges extending out of its eight
corners. The shaft rested on bearings cut into logs left projecting from the
underside of the race for that purpose. It was held down by cap bearings fitted
over it, and pinned with long tough pins. The shore end of the shaft was fitted
with the crank iron, the largest, and almost the only piece of metal in the
structure. The water struck the wheel a little short of its top and revolved it
toward the dam. When not attached to machinery it ran very rapidly. The crank
was about 18 inches long, and its bearing, or wrist about 3 or 4 inches in
diameter. Upon it there was slipped the pitman shaft. This was a tough piece
about 2 by 4 inches, 6 to 8 feet long, with one end concaved to fit the crank,
and with a pliable, split hickory bent into the shape of a U slipped over the
crank and pinned to the sides of the shaft. This bearing and those on the main
shaft, when lubricated at all, received a coat of soft soap, or a bushing of
pork rind. Often they ran dry, and the noises which came from them can be
imagined. The pitman shaft was attached at the top, almost above the crank, to
the bottom of the saw sash, with a pin joint. This saw sash was arranged exactly
like an ordinary window sash of two panes, the partition between the two panes
representing the saw blade, and the finger-lift the pitman attachment. The saw
blade was about eight inches wide, with teeth about 2 or 3 , inches long,
slanting so as to cut only when coming down. To feed the log to the saw, there
was a series of rollers at the front and back of the saw, turning on journals
made stationary. The rollers had notches around them near their ends. In these
notches ran the sills of a frame on which the log was rolled, fastened, and then
pried forward with hand spike or crow bar. Of course it was not long until
automatic feed was arranged. But as described, this was away ahead of hewing or
whipsawing boards.
I have described no building, for up to this point none
had been erected. In fact, many of the old mills sawed their lives away without
shelter of any kind. To this mill father hauled the first logs that entered into
the building of a house in this section. It was in the fall of 1837. I am not
sure as to the stage of water, but many times I have seen a log started into
that saw and the boards ripped off at a speed that now seems marvelous. Then
again, I have seen the saw start in with a will, slack its speed and stop before
the length of the log was made. Then the gate would be shut down until the pond
would fill up, then a start, a short run, another start and so on. A slow and
tedious process compared with that of modern steam saw mills.
While the Claytons were building their mill, our family
was producing its first crop. Scarcely had we got our household goods into the
house, before a little cleared ground was plowed, and the precious potato eyes
planted. Such was the scarcity of food, especially of potatoes, that no one
thought of planting the whole of the potato. I have known of the peelings
selling for two dollars a bushel, for seed. The plowing was done with the oxen
and the rudest old wooden mold board plow, with John doing the work. John
scarcely got a rest, except when the ground was frozen, for several years.
Settlers without force to break their ground were numerous, and oxen, plow and
boy went for miles around to help. Our own ground was barely cleared of the
brush, the smaller trees cut and burned and the grass roots scratched up, before
spring wheat was sown and corn planted. The larger trees were cut and removed,
and fences built after the planting. Ground once broke, got no further attention
except from four or five boys and girls with hoes. The new clean soil had no
weeds, and grass and sprouts were subdued with these hoes. These, like nearly
every other farming tool were hammered out by the frontier blacksmith, from
almost any piece of metal he could get. We brought ours with us. They were heavy
blades with an eye about an inch in diameter welded on, through which was driven
a tapering hickory pole with the bark on, the butt being driven into the eye
tightly, and wedged. The bark wore hard and slick from the hands. This implement
became smooth and bright, and all over its surface showed the irregular edges of
the welded pieces much like those on fine modern gun barrels. As the season
advanced, the contents of meal "chist" and flour "bar'l"
vanished, and even when new potatoes, wild fruits and meats in abundance were at
hand, yet the question of bread became a serious one. I have heard, and told,
tales of "hard up" early times. Such are usually accepted as funny.
But I almost shudder to think of those early settlements strung along the
streams, with the chance of bad crops, no stores of provisions, no way to reduce
grain to an edible state, and no roads across prairies from one stream to
another. The trails to and from the Mississippi at times were impassable. That
there was no famine is due to the oversight of a kind providence, and the
combination of the almost more than human effort and adaptability of the
settler. Julys, Augusts and Septembers of the first few years found the grain
supply very low, money always scarce and resources almost exhausted. So at the
maturing of that first crop of corn, I shall never forget with what satisfaction
Father was met when he came in with the first arm load of '`roasting ears."
It may have been a Sunday, anyway it was a day of change from the monotonous
round in the way of food. The milky ears were stripped out of their husks, these
tied back, and the silks removed, and all strung on the "jerk stick"
over the fire. Hot, crisp and brown, we munched it off without stopping for
seasoning. Of course after the first few meals we craved it less, and after a
while the eating of it became as much a duty as delight. We soon began again to
wish .for the baked pone, but the meal was gone. The settlers used many
ingenious ways of adapting new corn to the making of bread. Some
"gritted" it. Others, including our family "jointed" it.
That is, inverting a long carpenter's plane, called a jointer, over a tub, they
would take the corn just out of the milk, and by passing it a few times over the
plane which was set to cut a thin shaving; a nice quantity of "meal"
could soon be made. Indeed, a boy with a "jinter" could make more meal
in an hour than he could with a "gritter" in twice the time. "Jinted"
meal made the best of mush. Baked, it made our old "woolly" cake,
whose surface bristled with the shredded hulls and bits of cob. I sometimes
think of it on looking at an inferior tasting product of my daughters' skill,
which they call coconut cake. The "woolly" cake or pone made the
sweetest if most scratchy diet of my boyhood days. When the corn got hard enough
to shell and bother about "jinting," it was soaked to toughen and
soften it, and still "jinted" and served for breed and mush.
If, then, the scattered settlements could raise grain
enough the first season, the people could not subsist upon it unless it were
changed from its natural state. Corn only could be prepared by hand; wheat must
be ground. So it is easily seen with what joy the settler welcomed not only the
starting of the saws, but the starting of the buhrs.
The Claytons cut trees from the hillside and made a
road from the trail to the mill. These trees they sawed, to make the frame and
siding for the millshed. They had the mill enclosed by the winter of 1837, and
by spring had a gear rigged to the main staff, and a perpendicular shaft rising
above the floor of the shed was fitted with a run of buhrs. These, like the most
of the first ones started in the county, were of native material. That is, of
the round ''niggerheads'' found in the neighborhood. Some, it is true, were cut
from the limestone found along Chequest and other creeks, but gave out because
too soft or fragile. They were all rough shaped, but were scarcely attached
until they were pressed into service. Indeed, the first grain ground for our
family in Iowa, was ground by Samuel Clayton feeding it into the buhrs with his
hands, regulating the feed so as to get the best results, and stopping now and
then to brush up the cracked particles. There was no bolt. You simply took your
corn, shelled and carefully dried, awaited your turn and went home with as good
meal as any made in this country. But if it were wheat, of which Father took
some as soon as the mill started, it was to receive a product no housewife in
the present state of Iowa would recognize, much less dare make into bread; It
was merely cracked on the corn buhrs, not cleaned or bolted. From a cause I can
not explain, it was almost as black as soot. I can only say that for a few years
our spring wheat yielded well, flailed out fine, and when separated from the
chaff looked like first class wheat. But frequent grains were filled with smut.
With no way to distinguish a poor grain from good one, and no way to separate it
if we knew, and being surfeited on Indian corn, we simply cooked, ate and
actually relished this black bread. So much for our first mill, miller and
milling. Like it were those of the settlers all over the county. The absence of
all reference to these thirty creek mills in the records, speeches and writings
of the pioneers, so far as I know, is the excuse for my attempt. I have been too
long on the mechanical part to admit of relating more interesting features, as
might well be done. For it must not be thought that the settlers' troubles
stopped when the old mills started. Indeed, since each settler must await his
turn with his grist, whether he were one mile or twenty from his home, whether
in need or not, it was common for travelers passing cabins to be hailed with the
question, 'Is the mill a runnin'?" And quite often the response was,
"Creek too high," "Creek too low," "Froze up,"
"Shaft broke" or other such discouraging news. From the structure
described, it will be seen that a variation of three feet in the state of water
would clog the wheel, or run it dry. But when the answer was "Yes," it
was but the work of a few minutes for father to mount old Jule, take a bag of
grain "aboard" and trot off down the trail toward Clayton's. There it
was usual for many other settlers to be congregated and the mill to be
"throng." This situation would be seized upon by the politician,
newsmonger, claimtrader, horse tracer, wrestler, jumper, fisherman or swimmer,
and so on. I can not well close this sketch without relating a story current in
the early day, at the expense of Woods' mill, on Fox, where Mt. Sterling now
stands. I will say with positive assurance that many a settler's family has from
hunger stood in the place of the dog in this story, and every one of the old
mills is personified by Woods', in the tale.
Woods Brothers, great hunters, were the proprietors of
the mill. Whenever a settler with a bag of grain came in sight, a pack of hounds
set up a chorus of bawling until one of the proprietors came out and kicked and
cuffed them into silence, thus the place became known as "Dog town."
"Old Toller," the choice of the pack, was the only one allowed to
follow his master to the mill. And he received his name in the following way:
When the settler alighted and threw his bag into the mill, Mr. Woods would go
around, lift the gate and start the buhrs. Old Toller would gravely amble up in
front of the meal box and seat himself on his bony haunches. With the first thin
thread of meal trickling down, his face would lose its gloomy look, and when
enough had fallen to warrant the effort, he would rise, run out his long red
tongue and lap the box clean. As if it only served to whet his hunger to a point
of agony, he would gravely resume his seat, raise his tear stained face toward
the lazy buhr and let go the most pitiful `'Boo-oo-oo," for more meal.
PIONEER PERILS
AN ADVENTURE ON THE CEDAR RIVER AT CEDAR RAPIDS A HALF-CENTURY
AGO
Valuable as are family histories to climbers of
genealogical trees and to historians local and general, few contain very much of
general interest. When, now and then, the searcher for Iowa material happens in
upon a chapter, or even a paragraph, which at first hand relates some
characteristic incident or event of other days, he instinctively thinks of THE
ANNALS and of the appropriateness of its reappearance in that valuable medium of
connection between the present and our recent past.
Among the many memorial volumes recently added to
Iowa's Historical Department is a biographical sketch of the late John Weare, of
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, prepared by his son-in-law, W. W. Walker, also deceased.
Away back in the forties the prime movers in all
efforts for the development of the Cedar Valley, and eastern Iowa generally,
were two brothers-in-law, Alexander Ely and John Weare, both young men possessed
of some means and unbounded ambition, will-power and industry. Among the several
enterprises undertaken by these pioneers was the utilization of the splendid
water-power at "the Rapids." The hard work entailed by this enterprise
fell mainly upon Mr. Weare, the younger of the two, and bravely did he set
himself to the difficult task. His ingenuity and strength ere taxed to the
utmost, as we shall see. With six yoke of oxen he drew the logs from the woods,
and with a small force of men and insufficient machinery he helped lift every
timber into its place in the dam. For whole days he would remain in the water,
waist-deep, not stopping long enough to partake of the noon lunch. The nerve of
the man is well illustrated by an incident which occurred just as the dam was
nearing completion. At this point I turn over the narrative to Mr. Weare himself
as he related it to his son-in-law shortly before his death, leaving out only
such details as are unnecessary to the run of the story. In passing, let me say
that while Mr. Weare, like many another pioneer of Iowa, was not especially
fluent with his pen, he was an admirable reconteur, and his biographer did well
to draw from hi own lips, as far as he was able, the story of his eventful and
resultful career. The narrative, somewhat condensed, runs thus:
We deemed it wise to leave what remained of the old
dam, and use it as a protection to the new material as we put it in place below
the old structure. This proved a good scheme, in part, but it almost wrecked the
whole concern.
The new dam was nearly finished; a millwright had been
brought from the East, to set the machinery in the grist mill. We were about
ready to drag out the old dam, when the rains began, sending such a flood of
water against the old dam, that the new work was in great danger of being
destroyed, the timbers of the old dam being driven against them, battering out
the foundations. The entire community was deeply interested in the safety of the
mills; many of them had spent a season's hard work and all their money in the
enterprise; consequently the men, and even the women, did all they could do to
save the dam. They collected all the material that could be used and worked in
the pouring rain for days and late into the nights.
One morning it was apparent that the dam must go,
unless something could stop this battering ram, made by the old timbers. The
water was so high and swift we could not get near them to drag them out, even if
we could loosen the ends that were held down by the remains of the old dam. We
decided to build a crib of heavy logs, float it out into the river above, where
the most savage battering was going on, and sink it by filling it with stone.
Thus we hoped to make a breakwater, or protection above the old and the new dam.
We divided our men into two parties, one to stay on the bank and secure timber
or anything that could be made available to strengthen the crib, for often,
during high water, whole trees and heavy timbers came floating down the river. I
went with the larger party to the woods, to get logs with which to form the
crib. Before we separated, we entered into an agreement that, come what would,
no man should venture upon the threatened dam while the river was so high. If
the dam must go, there should be no loss of life.
About 4 o'clock in the afternoon, our party returned
with the logs. Before we came in sight of the river, we knew some calamity had
happened, for we heard the shouts of men and the shrieks of women. Of course we
thought the dam was gone. We were met by a half-witted boy, who breathlessly
exclaimed, "John, I tell 'em I can shoot 'em a chain, but they won't let
me." I hurried on to the river ahead of the oxen. A part of the dam was
gone, and a party of men were tossing on what seemed loose timbers, in the
center of the river, surrounded by a whirlpool filled by loose logs pounding and
dashing so violently that no means of escape seemed possible. A part of the men
led by Mr. Ely and the millwright had thought they could dislodge a timber that
was doing destructive work. They left the bank in two boats and were drawn into
the whirlpool formed by the current and the loosened timbers. The boats were
overturned and broken to pieces; the timbers taken out with them were caught in
the current and were an added danger to the dam and their lives. They had
succeeded in climbing upon the remaining part of the dam, but here there was no
safety. Any moment the rest of the dam might be swept away. If they escaped
drowning they could hardly escape being pounded to death by the timber. The few
men left on the banks had tried their utmost to rescue the party, but had met
with failure. They crowded about us and pleaded with us to save their friends.
We did not need their appeal. I could see we had material, in the logs just
brought from the woods, to make a raft that would safely bring the men out; but
how could we get it to them and get it away without its being drawn into the
whirlpool? The men were so near it that any boat or raft must have a power
pulling back of it to keep it from going into the pool.
During our perplexed questioning, the poor foolish boy
kept dancing before me, exclaiming, "I can shoot a chain to'em; let me
shoot!"
I urged the men to make the logs into a strong raft.
The night was coming on; the rain continued; the strength of the men on the dam
could not hold out, even if the dam did. The boy's importunate demand brought to
my mind something I had read, or heard, about establishing communication by
means of an arrow. I knew the boy was very skillful with his bow and arrow. I
went over in my mind a scheme to take our raft up the river above the whirlpool,
cross to the west side, then drift down near the dam, secure the raft firmly to
our boats; one man to go on the boat with the boy and he to shoot an arrow
carrying a string attached to a heavier string, and that to a heavier, and in
this way to send them a chain that could be fastened to some firm timber in the
dam. This would keep the raft from swinging into the whirlpool, while the men
could be loaded upon the raft. Then the men in boats could pull the raft to the
other side and thus our friends would be saved.
I incurred censure by spending precious time
experimenting with this boy and his arrows The string was heavy and would
tangle. I was ready to give up when an old lady came to me with linen thread and
beeswax. We wound the thread and waxed it, so it would not tangle; we laid it
loosely in a basket, and then tied one end to the arrow. The boy shot it and the
arrow went to the mark, and with it the string attached.
Ever since that day I have known the joy of an inventor
in the success of his labors. The raft was finished as soon as we were ready for
it. We could muster nine boats, two of them flatboats, the others skiffs and
canoes. We chained the raft to these boats and collected all the rope, chains
and strong string to be found. Thus equipped, about twenty-five strong men, and
our half-witted boy pushed out into the river. Every man had either a paddle, an
oar, or a pole. We were all strong, expert boatmen, and we had the life of our
little community in our hands. When our boats started we realized as we had not
realized before, that every man in the settlement was on the river, and in
greatest peril. It was no time for weakness. I felt so sure of success that I
urged the woman to go home and make coffee and have a good supper ready for us
when we should come back with the rescued men.
The Cedar river as it now is at "The Rapids"
gives no impression of the stream as it was then. It was fully two miles wide.
No one could estimate the depth of it. It was full of drift-wood which was
dashing and plunging like so many demons. The heavy raft was in great danger,
but it seemed a miracle that our little boats lived at all. All excepting the
flatboats were capsized at least once, and some of them many times. We moved up
the east bank of the river that we might escape the influence of the whirlpool.
We crossed in safety. We then drifted down on the west side until we felt the
pull of the whirlpool. Here we were dependent upon the boy and his arrows to
reach the men on the dam with a line attached to the raft which they could draw
to themselves and thus obtain control of the raft; otherwise there was not power
enough in the oarsmen in the boat to keep it out of the whirlpool. The first
shot fell short, but it was not entirely lost, as it attracted the attention of
the men and gave them an idea of our plans. The second arrow reached the dam and
lodged in one of the timbers. The thread was secured by the millwright and drawn
over, then the string attached to it, then the rope fastened to the string and,
finally, the chain which they were to make fast to some firm timber of the dam.
This was finally accomplished with great effort for the party were very weak,
and the water was swift and strong. The next difficult task was to loosen the
raft from the boats and yet leave it fastened to the flatboats by ropes long
enough to let it drift to the men and strong enough to tow the raft out of the
current. Rude as our appliance was, I had confidence that if our men would but
pull together, we would succeed; but I confess to fear as I left the boat and
set out on the raft. The party on the dam were almost exhausted. They never
could have boarded the raft alone much less keep it from getting into the
current. The raft was not large enough to bring back the party if laden with
more than two men. A courageous young man accompanied me. As we left the boats
our charge to the men was, "Hang to the ropes and pull when we wave our
caps."
We seemed to shoot down to the dam, and came against
the timbers with a crash; but thus far, we were safe. The chain was drawn in and
it held us from the current. All the men got on the raft. Never were caps waved
more gladly. We were supplied with poles, and we worked to the utmost of our
strength to start up stream, but could not move her.
Someone said, "The chain from the dam has not been
taken in." This was true; we were chained to the dam. We were too far from
it to reach the: fastened end of the chain, and we could not make our men in the
boat understand that all their heroic efforts in rowing only strained the chain
tighter, and kept us from returning to the dam to loosen it. If we, on the raft,
stopped poling a moment, we would swing into the current and drag them with us,
and all would be lost together. The millwright, with a small pocket knife, cut
the large rope cable which attached the chain to the raft. This had to be done,
lying face downward, with the head and shoulders under water. We then came up to
the boats, and the raft was attached. We returned to the east side of the river,
by the same route we went over, happy in the rescue of our relatives and
townsmen, who had been in peril from ten in the morning until dark—so dark we
could not have seen the faces of our delighted friends on the shore had they not
burned torches.
There was hardly a wink of sleep in our little village
that night, because of the general rejoicing over the rescue. Here and there,
some person, more thoughtful than the majority, gave a passing thought to the
dam, and expressed the hope that it would not go out; but the strain of anxiety
was passed. In face of the great danger escaped, the possibility seemed of
little consequence.
When morning came, we again gathered to make the crib,
and sink it above the old dam, as had before been planned. This was successfully
accomplished, and was the means of saving the new dam; but it has ever since
been my opinion, that the new dam was saved by one self-sacrificing woman. After
we had secured the crib, we found the stone we had wouldn't more than half sink
it. There was no heavier stone to be had for some distance. This woman came
forward and said, "Take the stone we
have ready for our new home. The last load is on the ground—and paid
for."
She ended her speech in tears. She had worked hard to
earn the money for the material, and giving it up meant another cold winter and
no home provided for her or her family. We used the stone; but, be it told, to
the credit of Cedar Rapids' first settlers, that stone was replaced, and a snug
little home was put up for this generous woman before the snow flew that fall.
|